Alexandria VA's Commercial Permit Process

The three review tracks

• Board of Architectural Review (BAR) — Certificates of Appropriateness for exterior work visible from public way in Old and Historic Alexandria District (OHAD), Parker-Gray District, and designated 100-Year-Old Buildings. Staff-level administrative approval or full BAR hearing.
• Development Site Plan (DSP) / Development Special Use Permit (DSUP) — required for larger projects (3+ dwelling units, 3,000+ sf buildings, 5+ parking spaces, etc. per Section 11-400 of the Zoning Ordinance). Runs through Planning & Zoning Development Division; Planning Commission approves.
• Code Administration building permit — USBC-based construction permit through APEX; Plan Review Services + New Construction Inspections.

All three can apply to a single project. Sequencing matters: BAR admin approval is recommended before building permit application; DSP final release is required before building permit packet goes to the Permit Center.

Primary sources: alexandriava.gov/Planning, alexandriava.gov/Preservation, alexandriava.gov/Code, alexandriava.gov/Permits.

BAR jurisdiction — what's in scope

• All new construction and exterior alterations visible from a public way within OHAD or Parker-Gray District require a Certificate of Appropriateness.
• Demolition exceeding 25 sf of material requires a Permit to Demolish, regardless of visibility.
• Interior work does not require BAR approval.
• 100-Year-Old Buildings (citywide designation) require BAR review for exterior changes.

The "visible from public way" qualifier is important — a rear addition concealed behind existing structures may escape BAR jurisdiction even in OHAD. Preservation staff field-verifies visibility.

The three levels of BAR approval

• No BAR approval needed — when the work falls outside BAR jurisdiction (interior-only, not visible from public way, below demolition threshold).
• BAR staff administrative approval — Preservation staff can approve routine alterations/repairs that align with adopted policies and are architecturally compatible and historically appropriate. Typically faster turn-around.
• Full BAR approval at public hearing — for projects that don't qualify for admin approval or are flagged for Board review. Monthly public hearings; testimony, evidence, conditions.

The Design Guidelines for Old & Historic Alexandria District and Parker-Gray District (1993, as amended) are the policy documents staff references. Contractors should design to the guidelines from schematic.

Development Site Plan (DSP) / DSUP

A DSP or DSUP must be approved before a building permit can issue on larger commercial projects. Triggers include:

• Developments with 3+ dwelling units.
• Buildings or additions 3,000 sf or larger.
• Parking lots with 5+ spaces.
• Building additions 1/3+ of existing gross sf.
• Other criteria in Zoning Ordinance Section 11-400.

The DSP process:

1. Concept Plan review — staff input on consistency with City plans.
2. Preliminary site plan submission — inter-agency review.
3. Final site plan submission — addressing review comments.
4. Planning Commission approval or denial — public hearing with written notice to abutting property owners.
5. Final site plan release — then building permit packet to Permit Center.

DSUP is the variant where the use requires Special Use Permit approval alongside site plan. City Council approves DSUPs after Planning Commission recommendation.

APEX — the electronic permit portal

APEX is the city's online system:

• Electronic permit application and plan submission.
• Document uploads.
• Fee payment processing.
• Real-time status tracking.
• Online inspection scheduling.

Commercial projects typically pay a 35% non-refundable deposit based on the estimated permit fee at plan review intake.

Code Administration — the technical review

The Department of Code Administration enforces VA's Uniform Statewide Building Code and City Code provisions:

• Permit Center — intake, fee assessment, permit issuance.
• Plan Review Services — structural, architectural, mechanical, plumbing, electrical review by discipline.
• New Construction Inspections — field inspections per VA Construction Code.
• Certificates of Occupancy — issued by Code Administration upon successful completion.

USBC is statewide (see our VA USBC essay) so the code base is consistent with Richmond, Fairfax, and elsewhere in VA. Procedural rhythm at Alexandria is what differs.

How the tracks sequence for a typical Alexandria commercial project

1. Verify historic district status — OHAD, Parker-Gray, 100-Year designation, or none.
2. Determine DSP/DSUP applicability against Zoning Ordinance Section 11-400.
3. Pre-application meetings with BAR staff (if historic) and P&Z Development (if DSP required).
4. Schematic design incorporating historic guidelines and zoning framework.
5. BAR approval path — administrative approval, or hearing if not admin-eligible. Before building permit.
6. DSP/DSUP process in parallel (Concept → Preliminary → Final → Planning Commission → final release). Before building permit.
7. APEX building permit submission — post final site plan release and BAR approval.
8. Plan review iterations with Code Administration.
9. Permit issuance and construction.
10. Inspections by Code Administration.
11. Certificate of Occupancy.

What trips up out-of-town contractors

• Applying for building permit before BAR approval. The Permit Center will hold or reject the application until BAR approval is documented.
• Underestimating DSP review time. Preliminary → Final → Planning Commission can run 6-12 months for complex projects.
• Assuming interior renovations don't touch BAR. Correct for interior-only; but if the project replaces a storefront or exterior door, BAR's in play.
• Missing the 25-sf demolition threshold. Small demolitions still trigger Permit to Demolish in historic districts.
• Forgetting the 100-Year-Old Buildings designation outside the formal historic districts.
• Treating Alexandria like Fairfax County. Different city, different process, different historic overlay density.
• Not using the Design Guidelines at schematic design. Retrofitting design to guidelines at BAR submission costs rework.

How Alexandria compares to peer historic cities

• Richmond CAR. Similar historic review framework (see our Richmond DPDR essay). Richmond's CAR sits under DPDR; Alexandria's BAR sits under Planning & Zoning Preservation.
• Baltimore CHAP. Historic review in Baltimore (see our Baltimore CHAP essay). Staff-level vs Commission review split similar to Alexandria's BAR admin vs hearing structure.
• Philadelphia Historical Commission. Philadelphia's COA process under the Historical Commission is analogous.
• Wilmington DRPC. Wilmington's Design Review and Preservation Commission does similar work at smaller scale.
• Alexandria BAR. The three-level approval structure (no approval / staff admin / full BAR hearing) is a clearly articulated version of the pattern.

What to do with this

If you're starting an Alexandria commercial project: verify historic district status as step one. If OHAD or Parker-Gray, engage Preservation staff early.

If the project is large enough for DSP/DSUP: Concept Plan review with Planning & Zoning Development Division. Don't skip this step.

If you're coordinating BAR + DSP + Code Administration: sequence BAR approval and DSP final release before APEX building permit submission. The Permit Center doesn't work around missing approvals.

For cross-city comparison, see Mid-Atlantic Permits Compared. For VA statewide code context, see VA USBC essay.

About The Hive

The Hive builds tools and publishes essays for working construction and MEP professionals in the Delaware Valley and Mid-Atlantic. Primary-source-grounded, practitioner-voiced, free to use.