Pennsylvania Healthcare Facility Licensure: Licensure Without CON

Pennsylvania is the outlier among the five Mid-Atlantic states on healthcare capital regulation. The PA Certificate of Need statute expired in 1996 and was not renewed. What remains is facility licensure — handled by the PA Department of Health's Bureau of Facility Licensure and Certification under 28 Pa. Code 101 et seq. (implementing the Health Care Facilities Act). No prospective "need" gate before construction. No batched review cycles. No state-agency review of whether the market needs the new facility. Just design to code, build, and then license the operational facility. This essay walks what licensure-only actually looks like for PA healthcare developers.

Pennsylvania hospital construction with medical facility and healthcare architecture at golden hour, photorealistic, warm cinematic lighting, open-market healthcare development aesthetic

The statutory framework

Primary source: health.pa.gov.

What facilities are licensed

Inpatient

Outpatient

The three-phase application process

  1. Phase One — Initial review. DOH staff review the submitted application. Results may include authorization for exam, notice of missing information, or fee request.
  2. Phase Two — Applicant response. Time for applicant or third parties to respond to application requirements: taking exams, providing educational documents, completing background checks, fulfilling training hours.
  3. Phase Three — Complete-application review. Time between DOH's receipt of a complete application (including exam results, training confirmation, and background checks) and final decision to issue or deny a license.

Specific application forms and checklists are facility-type-specific. Facilities also licensed by the Department of Human Services must submit Civil Rights Compliance forms for initial and renewal applications.

Inspections

Renewals

What "no CON" means in practice

Developers considering PA healthcare work get substantially more open-market conditions than in DE, NJ, MD, or VA:

Commercial development effects

The practical consequence of no CON for PA healthcare real estate:

Research cited by various policy groups suggests healthcare costs are higher in CON states (roughly 11% by some estimates), and hospital charges have dropped following CON repeal in states that have removed the framework. The policy debate is ongoing; the practical effect in PA is that capital deployment in healthcare is less encumbered than in neighboring CON states.

What the absence of CON doesn't mean

How PA's framework compares to neighbors

For the broader cross-state view, see our Certificate of Need Across the Mid-Atlantic essay and CON vs Licensure Distinction essay.

What to do with this

If you're planning PA healthcare development: budget for facility licensure substantively but skip the CON timeline entirely. First-to-market advantages are real.

If you're crossing into PA from a CON state: internalize that market due diligence replaces state-agency need review. The need question is answered by capital and operating pro forma, not by a commission.

If you're operating in PA: maintain clean inspection history, renew on time (21 days before expiration), and track CMS certification parallel to state licensure.

If you're comparing multi-state portfolios: PA's structural difference affects time-to-market on every project type. Budget differently.

About The Hive

The Hive builds tools and publishes essays for working construction and MEP professionals in the Delaware Valley and Mid-Atlantic. Primary-source-grounded, practitioner-voiced, free to use.